So how does the museum/archivist solve the conundrum of ethical dilemmas? Ethics are a tricky battlefield, as different stakeholders have varying perspectives on how cultural artifacts should be handled. For example, the question of whether mummified remains should be returned to their countries of origin or kept on display in institutions abroad illustrates this conflict. On one hand, source countries argue for repatriation to honor the deceased and respect their cultural traditions. On the other hand, institutions holding these artifacts might assert that public access to such items fosters global understanding and appreciation of diverse cultures. The solution likely involves finding a middle ground that respects the concerns of all parties involved. Open dialogue is essential for understanding different perspectives and negotiating compromises. In the case of mummified remains, one possible compromise could involve returning the remains to their countries of origin while creating digital reproductions, such as photographs or videos, that can be used for educational purposes. This way, the cultural heritage can still be shared with a broader audience without disregarding the ethical concerns of the home countries.
Image : A scene from the 2018 film, Black Panther, a main character questions the ethics of having stolen artifacts from his home country. In the film, he ends up stealing the artifacts, but is he in the wrong?
Applying this approach to this archival project, it's important to balance access to information with respect for Belén’s feelings towards her work and life being documented. Compromise, facilitated through open and respectful communication, such as our numerous conversations over her journals, ensures that her work and process are preserved and shared responsibly. By doing so, we help acknowledge both the rights of the public to access knowledge and the rights of artist to control their own cultural legacy.
コメント